cocoa touch - iOS 8 bug with navigation stack / rotation? -



cocoa touch - iOS 8 bug with navigation stack / rotation? -

i have 3 uiviewcontrollers: vc1, vc2, , vc3 appear in succession on uinavigationcontroller. vc1 has next rotation properties:

- (bool)shouldautorotate { homecoming yes; } - (bool) shouldautorotatetointerfaceorientation:(uiinterfaceorientation)tointerfaceorientation { homecoming (tointerfaceorientation == uiinterfaceorientationportrait); } - (nsuinteger)supportedinterfaceorientations { homecoming uiinterfaceorientationmaskportrait; } - (uiinterfaceorientation)preferredinterfaceorientationforpresentation { homecoming uiinterfaceorientationportrait; }

while vc2 , vc3 have next rotation properties:

- (bool)shouldautorotate { homecoming yes; } - (bool) shouldautorotatetointerfaceorientation:(uiinterfaceorientation)tointerfaceorientation { homecoming (tointerfaceorientation != uiinterfaceorientationportraitupsidedown); } - (nsuinteger)supportedinterfaceorientations { homecoming uiinterfaceorientationmaskallbutupsidedown; } - (uiinterfaceorientation)preferredinterfaceorientationforpresentation { homecoming self.presentedviewcontroller.interfaceorientation; }

while on vc3 (which preceded vc1 , vc2 on navigation stack of course), if user pushes restart button, want take them vc1:

- (void) restartbuttonpushed { [self.navigationcontroller poptorootviewcontrolleranimated:yes]; }

this works, if i'm in landscape mode on vc3, when force restart take me vc1 in landscape mode. whereas in < ios8, vc1 forced portrait mode. bug in ios8? or perchance fixed in ios8 exposed how doing wrong way?

interesting side note, if force restart button while in landscape mode , on vc2, works should, vc1 forced portrait mode.

ios cocoa-touch uiviewcontroller

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delphi change the assembly code of a running process -

Delphi change the assembly code of a running process - i'm trying alter address 00741fa5 has push test.009e721c . alter push test.009e71c8 . procedure callback; asm force $9e71c8 end; procedure tform2.btn1click(sender: tobject); var ppid :dword; pprocess : cardinal; begin getwindowthreadprocessid(findwindow(nil,pchar('test')), @ppid); pprocess := openprocess(process_all_access, false, ppid); injectasm(pprocess, $741fa5, 10, integer(@callback), 0); end; here injectasm function (with error checking) function injectasm(process: longword; injectaddress, injectsize, codeaddress, codesize : integer): pointer; var csize, rsize : integer; replaced : array of byte; jmp : array [0..4] of byte; jmpaddress : integer; nopv : byte; : integer; nbr: ulong_ptr; begin //injectsize must equal or greater 5, because need space our //(far) jmp wwxxyyzz instruction //if there's no space, inject in place of few instructions if injectsize ...
Read more

json - Hibernate and Jackson (java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot call sendError() after the response has been committed) -

json - Hibernate and Jackson (java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot call sendError() after the response has been committed) - hello have problem hibernate , jackson. have 2 pojos @entity @table(name = "users") public class user implements serializable { static final long serialversionuid = 4235637833262722256l; @id @generatedvalue private int id; @column(name = "creation_date") private date creationdate; @column(name = "first_name") private string firstname; @column(name = "last_name") private string lastname; @version @column(name = "version") private int version; @column(name = "e_mail") private string email; @column(name = "enabled") private boolean enabled; @column(name = "login") private string login; @column(name = "password") private string password; @jsonmanagedreference("role") @onetomany(mappedby = "user", cascade = cascadetype.all,fetch = fetchtyp...
Read more

C++ 11 "class" keyword -

C++ 11 "class" keyword - i've started using c++ 11 little bit more , have few questions on special uses of class keyword. know it's used declare class, there's 2 instances have seen don't understand: method<class t>(); and class class_name *var; why precede typename keyword class in first example, , keyword pointer in sec example? that known elaborated type specifier , necessary when class name "shadowed" or "hidden" , need explicit. class t { }; // love of god don't t t; t t2; if compiler smart, give these warnings: main.cpp:15:5: error: must utilize 'class' tag refer type 't' in scope t t2; ^ class main.cpp:14:7: note: class 't' hidden non-type declaration of 't' here t t; ^ if class not defined, deed forwards declaration. for example: template <typename t> void method() { using type = typename t::value_type; } method...
Read more